Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2018close
Date end:2018close
Threats* : Water infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve cameroon Cameroon 2018 Water infrastructure, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2018 Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
 Yes
grand canyon national parkGrand Canyon National Park united states of america United States of America 2018 Water infrastructure, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2018 Water infrastructure, No
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park argentina Argentina 2018 Water infrastructure, No
keoladeo national parkKeoladeo National Park india India 2018 Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Disappearance of Siberian cranes
 No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2018 Water infrastructure, No
lake turkana national parksLake Turkana National Parks kenya Kenya 2018 Water infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2018 Water infrastructure, Yes
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2018 Water infrastructure, Yes
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2018 Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching
Yes
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2018 Water infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top