Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animalsclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2004 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees
 No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2008 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices;
 Yes
delosDelos greece Greece 1994 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2006 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2005 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, No
mont-saint-michel and its bayMont-Saint-Michel and its Bay france France 1991 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, No
mont-saint-michel and its bayMont-Saint-Michel and its Bay france France 1990 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, No
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1996 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Other Threats: General poor state of conservation
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top