Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

88
Reports
35
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2014close
Threats* : Stormsclose
Sun Temple, Konârak (1997)
States Parties: India
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Gradual deterioration and the structural instability
The Loire Valley between Sully-sur-Loire and Chalonnes (2000)
States Parties: France
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Storms
The Sundarbans (2014)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Dredging of the Pashur River
The Sundarbans (2011)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Storms
The Sundarbans (2009)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Storms
The Sundarbans (2008)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Storms
Tikal National Park (1999)
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: Storms
Tikal National Park (1998)
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Storms
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Bangladesh Benin Chile Côte d'Ivoire Cuba Dominican Republic El Salvador France Guatemala Haiti Honduras India Italy Lithuania Madagascar Malta Mauritania Mozambique Panama Peru Portugal Russian Federation Solomon Islands United States of America Viet Nam
Threats
Storms 88

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top