State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1986 |
| Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1985 |
| Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Saint Lucia
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Saint Lucia
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Greece
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/10 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Mexico
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
| States Parties: |
Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
| States Parties: |
Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
| States Parties: |
Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
| States Parties: |
 China
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
China
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Algeria
|
| Year: | 1990 |
| Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Belize Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Cambodia China Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Greece Hungary Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Nepal Peru Russian Federation Saint Lucia Senegal Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
