Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

95
Reports
95
Properties concerned
64
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2010close
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction ; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: f) Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants;
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Ukraine
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire
States Parties: Colombia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Andorra
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: India
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: b) Loss of character of the cultural landscape directly associated with the property and its outstanding universal value;
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Serbia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Afghanistan
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Inclination of the Minaret
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top