Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

48
Reports
21
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Legal frameworkclose
Serengeti National Park (2002)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Threats to wildlife migration and populations
Simien National Park (2003)
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
Danger List:  Yes
Škocjan Caves (1996)
States Parties: Slovenia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Legal framework
Škocjan Caves (1995)
States Parties: Slovenia
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Legal framework
Volcanoes of Kamchatka (2004)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2010)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2009)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2008)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Belize Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Ecuador Ethiopia Guinea Honduras Kenya Niger Oman Panama Peru Romania Russian Federation Slovenia Solomon Islands United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania
Threats
Legal framework 48

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top