Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

26
Reports
11
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Governanceclose
Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (2006)
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument
Danger List:  Yes
Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (2005)
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric.
Danger List:  Yes
Ruins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara (2008)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes
Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (2008)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Governance
Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (2007)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Governance
Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (2006)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Governance
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Ecuador Indonesia Mauritania Mexico Panama Russian Federation Spain United Republic of Tanzania Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Threats
Governance 26

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top