Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2010close
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex thailand Thailand 2010 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors
 No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2010 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species;
 Yes
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra indonesia Indonesia 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
western caucasusWestern Caucasus russian federation Russian Federation 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top