Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1999close
Date end:1999close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
asante traditional buildingsAsante Traditional Buildings ghana Ghana 1999 Financial resources, No
butrintButrint albania Albania 1999 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Need for monitoring of the situation at the site
 Yes
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 1999 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1999 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1999 Financial resources, No
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta georgia Georgia 1999 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Critical conditions of particularly two archaeological sites
 No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 1999 Financial resources, No
mosi-oa-tunya / victoria fallsMosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls zambia,zimbabwe Zambia
Zimbabwe		 1999 Financial resources, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1999 Financial resources, Yes
peking man site at zhoukoudianPeking Man Site at Zhoukoudian china China 1999 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
 No
rwenzori mountains national parkRwenzori Mountains National Park uganda Uganda 1999 Financial resources, No
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1999 Financial resources, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top