State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
No |
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene | libya |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees |
No |
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties |
No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Fragile wooden heritage |
No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors |
Yes |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara | united republic of tanzania |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
No |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
tipasaTipasa | algeria |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures |
Yes |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.