Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

209
Reports
49
Properties concerned
31
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and communityclose
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: diminishing protection
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Viet Nam
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Weakening of the foundations by the vegetation
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: More attention to be paid to stone conservation
States Parties: Panama
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: More attention to be paid to stone conservation
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top