jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

5 SOC reports
1 Property(ies)
1 States Parties
Property: 700

Exports

 Table View
 List view
 Statistics
 Excel file

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category

  • Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana (2011)
    Peru
    Year: 2011
    Threats*: Housing, Air transport infrastructure, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Mining, Management systems/ management plan,
    Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
    Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B

  • Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana (2009)
    Peru
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Mining, Illegal activities,
    Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B

  • Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana (2007)
    Peru
    Year: 2007
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Crop production, Mining, Illegal activities,
    Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
    Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B

  • Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana (2006)
    Peru
    Year: 2006
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Crop production, Mining, Illegal activities,
    Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
    Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B

  • Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana (2005)
    Peru
    Year: 2005
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals, Crop production, Mining, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.