Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

7
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property: Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpaclose
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Housing Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Management systems/ management plan Mining
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Mining
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Mining
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Mining
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Crop production Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Management systems/ management plan Mining
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top