State of Conservation
10
Reports
4
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2005close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| abu menaAbu Mena | egypt Egypt |
2004 | Land conversion, | Yes |
| abu menaAbu Mena | egypt Egypt |
2003 | Land conversion, | Yes |
| abu menaAbu Mena | egypt Egypt |
2001 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Risk of collapse |
No |
| kasbah of algiersKasbah of Algiers | algeria Algeria |
2005 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of housing; b) Collapse of houses (three dead and others injured in May 2002) |
No |
| memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt |
2001 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
| memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt |
1999 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
| memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt |
1997 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
| memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt |
1995 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
| memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt |
1994 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
| ouadi qadisha (the holy valley) and the forest of the cedars of god (horsh arz el-rab)Ouadi Qadisha (the Holy Valley) and the Forest of the Cedars of God (Horsh Arz el-Rab) | lebanon Lebanon |
2003 | Land conversion, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
