Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

33
Reports
12
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
antigua guatemalaAntigua Guatemala guatemala Guatemala 1993 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake
 No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2010 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town
 No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2004 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1999 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1998 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1993 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1990 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic centre of the town of olindaHistoric Centre of the Town of Olinda brazil Brazil 1993 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic centre of the town of olindaHistoric Centre of the Town of Olinda brazil Brazil 1987 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2010 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2008 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2007 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2006 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2004 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic town of ouro pretoHistoric Town of Ouro Preto brazil Brazil 1990 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings, as well as the effect of heavy traffic on historic buildings
 No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2008 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings
 No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 2001 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 2000 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 1999 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 1998 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2007 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2006 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
port, fortresses and group of monuments, cartagenaPort, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena colombia Colombia 2012 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
san agustin archaeological parkSan Agustín Archaeological Park colombia Colombia 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: State of conservation of the fabric of the megalithic sculptures
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top