State of Conservation
7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador |
2000 | Financial resources, Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Invasive / alien marine species, Invasive/alien terrestrial species, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru |
2000 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Legal framework, Mining, | No |
| iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan, Surface water pollution, | Yes |
| los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia Colombia |
2000 | Civil unrest, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Storms, | Yes |
| sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
| whale sanctuary of el vizcainoWhale Sanctuary of El Vizcaino | mexico Mexico |
2000 | Marine transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Decline in sea animals populations |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
