Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2006 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Growth of native vegetation (Pinkuyo), the roots of which destabilize the foundations
 No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 2006 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards
 No
coro and its portCoro and its Port venezuela (bolivarian republic of) Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 2006 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Serious deterioration of materials and structure
 Yes
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2006 Management systems/ management plan, No
historic centre of mexico city and xochimilcoHistoric Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco mexico Mexico 2006 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Urban decay of the Historic Centreb) Water and environmental pollutionc) Lack of monitoring systems
 No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2006 Management systems/ management plan, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2006 Management systems/ management plan, No
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan honduras Honduras 2006 Management systems/ management plan, No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2006 Management systems/ management plan, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top