Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2000close
Date end:2000close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore pakistan Pakistan 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
gondwana rainforests of australiaGondwana Rainforests of Australia australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park
No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area
No
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area china China 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top