Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
bordeaux, port of the moonBordeaux, Port of the Moon france France 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
city of vicenza and the palladian villas of the venetoCity of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto italy Italy 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
dresden elbe valleyDresden Elbe Valley germany Germany 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai russian federation Russian Federation 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2009 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
 No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic centre of viennaHistoric Centre of Vienna austria Austria 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor montenegro Montenegro 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
rock drawings in valcamonicaRock Drawings in Valcamonica italy Italy 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
western caucasusWestern Caucasus russian federation Russian Federation 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top