Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
architectural, residential and cultural complex of the radziwill family at nesvizhArchitectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh belarus Belarus 2009 Management activities, No
gelati monasteryGelati Monastery georgia Georgia 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
 No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
 No
historic centre of bruggeHistoric Centre of Brugge belgium Belgium 2009 Management activities, No
historical centre of the city of yaroslavlHistorical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl russian federation Russian Federation 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Changes in the built fabric
 No
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta georgia Georgia 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: f) Loss of authenticity
 No
old town of regensburg with stadtamhofOld town of Regensburg with Stadtamhof germany Germany 2009 Management activities, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top