State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2008close
Date end:2008close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park | montenegro Montenegro | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
historic centre of sighişoaraHistoric Centre of Sighişoara | romania Romania | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Deterioration of monuments in general and the fortifications in particular |
No |
isole eolie (aeolian islands)Isole Eolie (Aeolian Islands) | italy Italy | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
pyrenees - mont perduPyrénées - Mont Perdu | france,spain Spain France |
2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan Azerbaijan | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | Yes |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2008 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.