Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

19
Reports
19
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2013close
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
alto douro wine regionAlto Douro Wine Region portugal Portugal 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
ancient city of nessebarAncient City of Nessebar bulgaria Bulgaria 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
archaeological areas of pompei, herculaneum and torre annunziataArchaeological Areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata italy Italy 2013 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Series of structural collapses at the property
No
budapest, including the banks of the danube, the buda castle quarter and andrássy avenueBudapest, including the Banks of the Danube, the Buda Castle Quarter and Andrássy Avenue hungary Hungary 2013 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation of residential housing in the area inscribed as World Heritage
No
cathedral, alcázar and archivo de indias in sevilleCathedral, Alcázar and Archivo de Indias in Seville spain Spain 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
cultural and historic ensemble of the solovetsky islandsCultural and Historic Ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring
No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2013 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
historic centres of berat and gjirokastraHistoric Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra albania Albania 2013 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Fire
No
historical centre of the city of yaroslavlHistorical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
kremlin and red square, moscowKremlin and Red Square, Moscow russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
kyiv: saint-sophia cathedral and related monastic buildings, kyiv-pechersk lavraKyiv: Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Related Monastic Buildings, Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra ukraine Ukraine 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
l'viv – the ensemble of the historic centreL'viv – the Ensemble of the Historic Centre ukraine Ukraine 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
liverpool – maritime mercantile cityLiverpool – Maritime Mercantile City united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2013 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
medieval monuments in kosovoMedieval Monuments in Kosovo serbia Serbia 2013 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Unsatisfactory state of conservation and maintenance of the property
Yes
neolithic site of catalhoyukNeolithic Site of Çatalhöyük turkiye Türkiye 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
palace of westminster and westminster abbey including saint margaret’s churchPalace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2013 Management systems/ management plan, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top