State of Conservation
30
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2004close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
| States Parties: |
 Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Fencing along the international border |
| States Parties: |
 Montenegro
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Fire |
| States Parties: |
 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
| States Parties: |
 Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/INF.9 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1986 |
| Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1985 |
| Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Croatia
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Croatia
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Croatia
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.14,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Neglected Park infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
