Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2013close
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological areas of pompei, herculaneum and torre annunziataArchaeological Areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata italy Italy 2013 Management activities,
Other Threats: Series of structural collapses at the property
 No
cultural and historic ensemble of the solovetsky islandsCultural and Historic Ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management activities,
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring
 No
gelati monasteryGelati Monastery georgia Georgia 2013 Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
 Yes
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2013 Management activities,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
 No
historic centres of berat and gjirokastraHistoric Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra albania Albania 2013 Management activities,
Other Threats: Fire
 No
historical centre of the city of yaroslavlHistorical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management activities, No
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta georgia Georgia 2013 Management activities, Yes
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Management activities, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top