Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2013close
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreationclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological areas of pompei, herculaneum and torre annunziataArchaeological Areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata italy Italy 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Series of structural collapses at the property
 No
giant's causeway and causeway coastGiant's Causeway and Causeway Coast united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
gulf of porto: calanche of piana, gulf of girolata, scandola reserveGulf of Porto: Calanche of Piana, Gulf of Girolata, Scandola Reserve france France 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
pitons, cirques and remparts of reunion islandPitons, cirques and remparts of Reunion Island france France 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
western caucasusWestern Caucasus russian federation Russian Federation 2013 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top