Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2010close
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructureclose
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Other Threats: b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of a maintenance programme, as well as polluted water
States Parties: Belgium
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Other Threats: b) Cracks appearing on the surface of the old bridge.
States Parties: Lebanon
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top