Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2017close
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Governanceclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2017 Governance, Yes
cultural landscape of bali province: the subak system as a manifestation of the tri hita karana philosophyCultural Landscape of Bali Province: the Subak System as a Manifestation of the Tri Hita Karana Philosophy indonesia Indonesia 2017 Governance, No
kenya lake system in the great rift valleyKenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley kenya Kenya 2017 Governance, No
liverpool – maritime mercantile cityLiverpool – Maritime Mercantile City united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2017 Governance, Yes
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2017 Governance,
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints
No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2017 Governance,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Yes
rainforests of the atsinananaRainforests of the Atsinanana madagascar Madagascar 2017 Governance, Yes
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey benin Benin 2017 Governance,
Other Threats: Fire at the site
No
socotra archipelagoSocotra Archipelago yemen Yemen 2017 Governance, No
south china karstSouth China Karst china China 2017 Governance, No
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra indonesia Indonesia 2017 Governance, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top