Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

24
Reports
24
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Interpretative and visitation facilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of structures
States Parties: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development Ground transport infrastructure Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors around the property
States Parties: China
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Viet Nam
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Illegal activities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Afghanistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Civil unrest
Other Threats: a) Fragile state of the cliffs and nichesb) Presence of anti-personnel mines in the are
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources Housing Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: India
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Housing Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Water (rain/water table) Wind
Other Threats: poor state of conservation
States Parties: China
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: loss of traditional urban fabric
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Impact on the archaeological remains as well as on the visual integrity of the site by the newly constructed Maya Devi Temple in 2002.
States Parties: India
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of detailed property documentation
States Parties: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
States Parties: Afghanistan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Civil unrest Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Inclination of Minaret
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Earthquake
States Parties: Philippines
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev
Threats*: Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system Financial resources Housing Human resources Illegal activities Legal framework Management activities Management systems/ management plan Society's valuing of heritage
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top