Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

18
Reports
8
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Threats* : Air pollutionclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Arles, Roman and Romanesque Monuments (1994)
States Parties: France
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/10
Threats*: Air pollution
Białowieża Forest (2004)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Fencing along the international border
City of Valletta (1994)
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Highly crumbly basic building material
City of Valletta (1991)
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/3
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Highly crumbly basic building material
Great Smoky Mountains National Park (2006)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Great Smoky Mountains National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Air pollution
Great Smoky Mountains National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Air pollution
Historic Centre of Rome, the Properties of the Holy See in that City Enjoying Extraterritorial Rights and San Paolo Fuori le Mura (1993)
States Parties: Italy Holy See
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Air pollution
Historic Centre of Rome, the Properties of the Holy See in that City Enjoying Extraterritorial Rights and San Paolo Fuori le Mura (1992)
States Parties: Italy Holy See
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Air pollution
Plitvice Lakes National Park (2021)
States Parties: Croatia
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Plitvice Lakes National Park (2018)
States Parties: Croatia
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Wood Buffalo National Park (2023)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures
Wood Buffalo National Park (2021)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures
Yellowstone National Park (2012)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Yellowstone National Park (2010)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Yellowstone National Park (2008)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Yellowstone National Park (2006)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Yellowstone National Park (2005)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Air pollution
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Belarus Canada Croatia France Holy See Italy Malta Poland United States of America
Threats
Air pollution 18

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top