Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

173
Reports
36
Properties concerned
28
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Threats* : Oil and gasclose
Volcanoes of Kamchatka (2010)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Volcanoes of Kamchatka (2008)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Wood Buffalo National Park (2023)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures
Wood Buffalo National Park (2021)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures
Wood Buffalo National Park (2019)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge
Wood Buffalo National Park (2017)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge
Yellowstone National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (2000)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1999)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1998)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1997)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1996)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1995)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Bangladesh Belize Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo France Guinea Kenya Lesotho Lithuania Malawi Mauritania Oman Panama Peru Philippines Russian Federation South Africa Spain United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Zimbabwe
Threats
Oil and gas 173

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top