jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Samarra Archaeological City (2008)

Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

This will be defined as soon as the situation allows it.

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds

Total amount provided to the property: USD 100,000 from the Nordic World Heritage Fund for training and documentation aiming at the preparation of the Nomination File.

International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0
Total Amount Ap proved: 0USD

Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

State of war in the country that does not allow the responsible authorities to assure the protection and management of the property.

Corrective Measures

a) Establishment of a local management coordination unit on the site;

b) Preparation and implementation of a conservation and management plan;

c) Maintenance and emergency conservation activities.

 

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

No specific timeframe has yet been set by the World Heritage Committee or State Party, which mainly depends upon the evolution of the situation in the country.

Current conservation issues

On 12 February 2008, the World Heritage Centre received a report from the State Party. The Archaeological City of Samarra remains an insecure military area and, therefore, the archaeological and administrative staff is not able to carry out its work.

The camp built between the House of Ornaments (north) and the Caliph Palace (south) and the sand mound built by the military forces still exist (the mound starts from the entrance of the modern city, passes close to Caliph Al Mu’atasim Palace, turns to Abbasid Horse Race Tracks, and finally goes down until Al Qadisiyah residential area), having a serious impact upon the important remains of the ancient city. There is also deep concern regarding the movements and presence of military vehicles over the clay-made antiquities in the City of Samarra.

Moreover, owing to the above issues and the lack of periodic maintenance, some of the archaeological buildings of the property are in great need of protection. These buildings include the House of Ornaments, the Caliph Palace, Al-Mashuq Palace, the spiral minaret, and the Abu Dulaf Mosque.

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies remain deeply concerned by the continued movements of military vehicles over archaeological remains and other military activities that could affect the outstanding universal value of the property.

Conclusion
Decision

  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

32COM7A.17
Link to the decision

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-08/32.COM/7A,

2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 8B.23 adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007),

3. Notes with great concern the continuing difficult situation in Iraq and deplores the loss of human lives;

4. Also notes with concern the continued destruction of the archaeological remains, e.g. through vehicular movements and calls upon the State Party to ensure that this is addressed;

5. Encourages the State Party, should the situation allow it, to implement the corrective measures identified:

            a) establishment of a local management coordination unit on the site;

            b) preparation and implementation of a conservation and management plan;

            c) maintenance and emergency conservation activities;

6. Reiterates its request to the State Party to develop, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, a proposal for the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;

7. Calls upon the international community to assist, in every way possible, the State Party in the protection of this property, with the advice of ICOMOS;

8. Requests the State Party, should the situation allow, to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to Samarra;

9. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2009, a report for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;

10. Decides to retain Samarra Archaeological City (Iraq) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Draft Decision: 32 COM 7A.17

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-08/32.COM/7A,

2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 8B.23 adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007),

3. Notes with great concern the continuing difficult situation in Iraq and deplores the loss of human lives;

4. Requests the State Party, should the situation allow it, to establish a site management unit and to initiate the preparation of a conservation and management plan for the property;

5. Reiterates its request to the State Party to develop, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, a proposal for the Desired state of conservationfor the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger,for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;

6. Calls upon the international community to assist the State Party in the protection of this property;

7. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2009, a report for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;

8. Decides to retain Samarra Archaeological City (Iraq) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

 

Samarra Archaeological City
State Party:
Iraq
Date of Inscription: 2007
Nomination records (Year): 1982, 2006
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(iv)
Danger List: Yes
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Threats*
  • War
  • Other Threats:
Documents
WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Other Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...
SOC ID: 784
Inscription on the Danger List
Year: 2007
Threats to the Site:

The state of conflict in the country does not allow the responsible authorities to assure the protection and management of the property.


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.