Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Niokolo-Koba National Park

Senegal
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Drought
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Illegal activities
  • Invasive/alien terrestrial species
  • Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals
  • Mining
  • Translocated species
  • Water infrastructure
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Poaching, capture and relocation of wildlife
  • Drying up of ponds and invasive species
  • Illegal logging
  • Livestock grazing
  • Road construction project
  • Potential dam construction
  • Potential mining exploration and exploitation
  • Loss of chimpanzee habitat
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
  • Poaching
  • Livestock grazing
  • Dam construction project at Sambangalou
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

Adopted, see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/4087
Revised (finalization of indicators) in 2015, see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6232  

Corrective Measures for the property

Adopted, see page  

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

Total amount granted: USD 250 000 from the Government of Norway (2021-2022)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 9 (from 1982-2017)
Total amount approved : 206,799 USD
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 23 March 2022, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/153/documents/. Additional information was provided on 23 January 2023 in the framework of the implementation of a project funded by the generous contribution of the Government of Norway in support of the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger. The reports include the following information:

  • The partnership with the NGO Panthera and the installation of camera traps in approximately 30% of the property enabled the observation in 2021 of 45 species of mammals including species of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), except for the elephant, which is in a critical situation within the property;
  • A 2016-2021 comparative study has confirmed the relict presence of a small number of chimpanzees in the impact zone of the Petowal Mining Company (PMC);
  • A biannual emergency plan to prevent the extinction of the last population of the lycaon in West Africa is being launched in partnership with IUCN’s Save Our Species programme;
  • Surveillance has been considerably strengthened (145 additional agents, three mobile brigades, two new surveillance posts, 321 km of surveillance trails rehabilitated, a ULM acquired). Surveillance missions in the Park's eastern zone have helped reduce the impact of illegal gold mining;
  • Analyses carried out on water samples near the Mako mine demonstrate its compliance with standards except in its levels of manganese, ammonium and sulphate in the groundwater, and its levels of iron and suspended matter in surface waters;
  • A soil and water testing laboratory has been installed in the Park premises, and a mobile laboratory has been set up to identify pollutants in the property;
  • Control measures against the invasive species Mimosa pigra are planned and funded in partnership with the US Forest Service and Niokolodge in three infested ponds;
  • The Mansadala quarry remains open to finalize National Road N°8 (RN8). Various faunistic species are present for which protection and restoration measures are implemented;
  • Funding for the Sambangalou dam has been secured and as part of the construction work, the Gambia River Basin Development Organization (OMVG) has requested the support of the IUCN Regional Office for Central and West Africa (Central and West Africa Programme (PACO)) to carry out an evaluation of all the studies linked to the impact of the dam and the modification of the hydrological regime of the Gambia River (studies on the biodiversity of the PNNK and the chimpanzees in particular, and the Adaptive Environmental Flow Strategy (SADE)). In addition, water level gauges have been installed in the Simenti, Kountadala and Nianaka ponds for hydraulic monitoring in order to have reference benchmarks;
  • The State Party has not provided the necessary environmental approval for the launch of the Barrick Gold project and an ESIA was conducted;
  • Awareness-raising sessions for livestock breeders are held in the villages on the outskirts of the property concerning the dangers of cattle roaming, particularly those linked to the risk of transmitting zoonotic diseases;
  • A traffic control system has been set up to limit the speed of traffic on this stretch of Route Nationale 7; 26 road signs have been erected to make users aware of the risks of colliding with wildlife, and 6 speed bumps installed to regulate vehicle speed;
  • There has been no improvement in marking the boundaries of the property, due to the land dispute in the Mako sector and the sensitivity of the border with the Republic of Guinea.

On 27 April 2022, the State Party submitted a report on the round table consultation with technical and financial partners which took place in November 2021 with a view to strengthen the effective dialogue and collaboration of all stakeholders in the sustainable conservation of the property.

In June 2022, the State Party took part in a workshop to support the process of removing natural properties from the List of World Heritage in Danger in French-speaking Africa. In June 2023, a workshop is planned to follow up on the Desired state of conservation, in order to present progress in implementing corrective measures and achieving the DSOCR.

On August 27, 2022, the State Party sent the World Heritage Centre the additional studies carried out on the environment and biodiversity of the Niokolo Koba National Park in connection with the Sambangalou Hydroelectric Development Project (PAHS).

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The State Party’s continual efforts to implement corrective measures is positive. The means of surveillance have been strengthened considerably, notably with the significant increase in the number of agents, the creation of two control posts and the organization of the 2021 round table to reinforce conservation in the property, among others. Illegal gold mining is on the decline. It is recommended to congratulate the State Party on its significant efforts, to encourage it to continue its actions, and to request that it now provides further precise mapping information on the location of infractions and on the urgent measures requested to restore habitats degraded by illegal gold mining.

In addition, the rehabilitation of 321 km of tracks in the property in 2021, the organization of awareness-raising sessions to combat cattle roaming and the introduction of a road control system are positive developments. While noting that there has been no improvement in the marking of the property's boundaries, it is recommended that the Committee commends the State Party for the actions undertaken and requests it to continue implementing the corrective measures as updated by the 2015 Reactive Monitoring mission, the various recommendations made in the 2021 roundtable report, as well as the recommendations of the June 2022 and June 2023 workshops.

It is recommended to welcome the improvement of the ecological monitoring and to request the State Party to provide data on the state of conservation and population trends of all the species characteristic of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), notably with regard to the elephant and the lycaon.

Although the 2016-2021 comparative study of the fauna in the impact zone of the PMC demonstrates the presence of many species, in particular chimpanzees, the information provided is not sufficient to assess the size, trends and sustainability of the populations, and no mitigation measures seem to have been undertaken to limit the negative impacts of the mining operations.

Improvements in pollution monitoring, notably in the Gambia River, with the installation of a mobile laboratory and in Tambacounda are positive. Nevertheless, the results obtained from the analyses of groundwater and surface water in 2021 continue to show abnormally high concentrations of ammonium, manganese, sulphate, iron and sediment loads respectively. It is recommended that urgent measures be taken to identify the cause of this pollution in order to limit it and that additional microbiological analyses be carried out.

Work to control the invasive species Mimosa pigra in the three heavily invaded ponds is welcomed, but beyond these cases, no information is provided on the invasive species and the associated control strategy.

Although the intended restoration and protection measures at the Mansadala quarry will limit the environmental impacts following its closure, it is worrying to note that this quarry remains open and it is recommended to stop its activity and restore the zone as soon as possible.

Noting that funding for the Sambangalou dam works has now been secured and that construction work has effectively begun on the site, the concerns previously expressed about the potential impacts of the dam on the OUV of the property remain valid. The technical support requested by the State Party from IUCN PACO through OMVG to carry out the evaluation of all the studies linked to the impact of the dam, in addition to the installation of limnometric scales in the ponds of Simenti, Kountadala and Nianaka for hydraulic monitoring in order to have reference situations on the evolution of the hydrological regime of the Gambia River are noted. A preliminary assessment of the additional studies carried out on the environment and biodiversity of the Niokolo-Koba National Park shows that the construction of the Sambangalou dam will cause a non-negligible change in the hydrological regime of the Gambia River, downstream of the dam, and that the dam's impacts on the ecosystems of the Niokolo-Koba Park, notably the distribution of large and medium-sized mammalian fauna, in particular elephant, Derby eland, buffalo, hippopotamus, lion, lycaon and chimpanzee, will be considerable. Bearing in mind that a detailed analysis of these studies by IUCN will be made available to the State Party at a later date, it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to provide, on the one hand, the Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP) from which the additional studies derive and, on the other hand, the report of the working group responsible for producing the synthesis of the various studies concerning the analysis of potential impacts and the proposal of selected compensation measures, to ensure that a full assessment of the potential impacts on the OUV has been carried out in accordance with World Heritage impact assessments guidelines and best practices, and that the proposed mitigation measures, including any adjustments to project implementation, will effectively reduce these unavoidable residual impacts.

The ESIA provided for the Barrick Gold Corporation’s mining project indicates numerous potential environmental threats including the decline in the quality and quantity of water, variation in the sediment regime of the Niokolo Koba River, the spread of pollutants, the destruction of pristine terrestrial and aquatic habitats of endangered species, like chimpanzees. Furthermore, the increase in traffic on the RN8, in the risk of poaching, and in the spread of invasive exotic species related to the flows of population also constitute worrying potential threats highlighted in the ESIA. Considering that this project could have direct, indirect and cumulative negative consequences on the ecological integrity and the OUV of the property, the State Party is requested not to pursue the project as currently proposed.

In view of the positive developments in the management of the property, the progressive improvement of the ecological monitoring system, and the efforts undertaken to preserve the integrity of the property despite ongoing development projects, it is recommended that the Committee requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7A.13
Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal) (N 153)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7A.50 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Takes note of the efforts made by the State Party to implement the corrective measures, notably those concerning the monitoring of certain key species for the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) and the monitoring of the property, and requests the State Party to continue the implementation of these measures as updated by the 2015 Reactive Monitoring mission, the various recommendations formulated by the workshops of November 2021, June 2022 and June 2023, in support of the implementation of corrective measures and the achievement of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR);
  4. Welcomes the considerable increase in the means of surveillance brought to the property and the decline of illegal gold mining among the recorded offences during the past three years, requests the State Party to provide precise additional data and maps showing the location of the main offences and threats identified, as well as information on their severity and extent, and on the actions taken to combat them, and reiterates its request to the State Party to take urgent measures to restore habitats degraded by illegal gold mining;
  5. Notes with satisfaction the progressive improvement of the ecological monitoring system and also requests the State Party to provide precise data on the state of conservation and the population trends of all the species characteristic of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), notably the elephant and the lycaon, in critical situation within the property;
  6. Reiterates its deep concern at the persistence of threats endangering the population of 15 threatened chimpanzees present in the impact zone of the Petowal Mining Company and urges the State Party to continue the annual ecological monitoring of this population and the implementation of actions to mitigate the impact of the main threats to the conservation of the species;
  7. Welcomes the controls carried out in relation to mining pollution and the installation of water and soil testing equipment at the property, but reiterates its utmost concern over high concentrations of ammonium, manganese and sulphate in the groundwater, and iron and heavy metals in the surface waters of the Gambia River, and further requests that water analyses be continued, that additional microbiological analyses be carried out, and that urgent measures be taken to identify the cause of this pollution and to control it permanently;
  8. Notes with satisfaction the identification and planning of the fight against the invasive species Mimosa pigra in three ponds of the property, but further requests the State Party to provide additional information on the other invasive species throughout the property and to develop an associated control strategy;
  9. Takes note of the protection and restoration measures planned at the time of the closure of the Mansadala quarry but reiterates once again its request to the State Party to immediately close this quarry given its negative impact on the OUV of the property;
  10. Noting that the financing for the Sambangalou dam has now been secured and that construction work is already underway, reiterates its concern about the potential impacts of the dam on the OUV of the property, notably on the hydrological regime of the Gambia River, downstream of the dam and on the distribution of large and medium-sized mammalian fauna, as indicated by the preliminary analysis of the complementary studies carried out on the environment and biodiversity of the Niokolo-Koba National Park and requests the State Party to provide, on the one hand, the Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP) from which the complementary studies were derived, and on the other, the report of the working group responsible for producing the synthesis of the various studies on the analysis of potential impacts and the proposal of selected compensation measures retained for examination by IUCN, to ensure that a full assessment of the potential impacts on OUV has been carried out in accordance with World Heritage impact assessments guidelines and best practices, and that the proposed mitigation measures, including any adjustments to project implementation, will effectively reduce these unavoidable residual impacts;
  11. Also expresses its concern about the numerous major potential impacts highlighted by the ESIA of the Barrick Gold mining project on the OUV of the property and its peripheral zone, and takes note that the State Party has not provided an environmental approval for its launch;
  12. Requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, to assess the state of conservation of the property, including with regard to the above issues, the implementation of the updated corrective measures and recommendations of the 2015 Reactive Monitoring mission, and the progress made in achieving the indicators of the DSOCR;
  13. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session;
  14. Decides to retain Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
45 COM 8C.2
Update of the List of World Heritage in Danger (Retained Properties)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC/23/45.COM/7A, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add.2, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add.3, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add.4),
  2. Having examined the recommendations of the Advisory Bodies, decides to retain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Afghanistan, Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley (Decision 45 COM 7A.51)
  • Afghanistan, Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Decision 45 COM 7A.52)
  • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna (Decision 45 COM 7A.55)
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of), City of Potosí (Decision 45 COM 7A.18)
  • Central African Republic, Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.3)
  • Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.4)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Garamba National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.5)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kahuzi-Biega National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.6)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Okapi Wildlife Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.7)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Virunga National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.8)
  • Egypt, Abu Mena (Decision 45 COM 7A.26)
  • Honduras, Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.1)
  • Indonesia, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (Decision 45 COM 7A.15)
  • Iraq, Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) (Decision 45 COM 7A.27)
  • Iraq, Hatra (Decision 45 COM 7A.28)
  • Iraq, Samarra Archaeological City (Decision 45 COM 7A.29)
  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (site proposed by Jordan) (Decision 45 COM 7A.31)
  • Kenya, Lake Turkana National Parks (Decision 45 COM 7A.10)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene (Decision 45 COM 7A.33)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Decision 45 COM 7A.34)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Decision 45 COM 7A.35)
  • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès (Decision 45 COM 7A.36)
  • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus (Decision 45 COM 7A.37)
  • Madagascar, Rainforests of the Atsinanana (Decision 45 COM 7A.11)
  • Mali, Old Towns of Djenné (Decision 45 COM 7A.22)
  • Mali, Timbuktu (Decision 45 COM 7A.23)
  • Mali, Tomb of Askia (Decision 45 COM 7A.24)
  • Mexico, Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California (Decision 45 COM 7A.2)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of), Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia (Decision 45 COM 7A.53)
  • Niger, Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves (Decision 45 COM 7A.12)
  • Palestine, Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir (Decision 45 COM 7A.39)
  • Palestine, Hebron/Al-Khalil Old Town (Decision 45 COM 7A.38)
  • Panama, Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (Decision 45 COM 7A.19)
  • Peru, Chan Chan Archaelogical Zone (Decision 45 COM 7A.20)
  • Romania, Roșia Montană Mining Landscape (Decision 45 COM 7A.56)
  • Senegal, Niokolo-Koba National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.13)
  • Serbia, Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (Decision 45 COM 7A.57)
  • Solomon Islands, East Rennell (Decision 45 COM 7A.16)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Aleppo (Decision 45 COM 7A.40)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra (Decision 45 COM 7A.41)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Damascus (Decision 45 COM 7A.42)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient Villages of Northern Syria (Decision 45 COM 7A.43)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din (Decision 45COM 7A.44)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Site of Palmyra (Decision 45 COM 7A.45)
  • United Republic of Tanzania, Selous Game Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.14)
  • United States of America, Everglades National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.17)
  • Uzbekistan, Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (Decision 45 COM 7A.54)
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Coro and its Port (Decision 45 COM 7A.21)
  • Yemen, Historic Town of Zabid (Decision 45 COM 7A.47)
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a (Decision 45 COM 7A.49)
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam (Decision 45 COM 7A.50)
3.    Recalls that the following properties were inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger at its 18th extraordinary session (UNESCO, 2023):
  • Lebanon, Rachid Karami International Fair-Tripoli (Decision 18 EXT.COM 5.1)
  • Ukraine, The Historic Centre of Odesa (Decision 18 EXT.COM 5.2)
  • Yemen, Landmarks of the Ancient Kingdom of Saba, Marib (Decision 18 EXT.COM 5.3)
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7A.13

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7A.50, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Takes note of the efforts made by the State Party to implement the corrective measures, notably those concerning the monitoring of certain key species for the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) and the monitoring of the property, and requests the State Party to continue the implementation of these measures as updated by the 2015 Reactive Monitoring mission, the various recommendations formulated by the workshops of November 2021, June 2022 and June 2023, in support of the implementation of corrective measures and the achievement of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR);
  4. Welcomes the considerable increase in the means of surveillance brought to the property and the decline of illegal gold mining among the recorded offences during the past three years, requests the State Party to provide precise additional data and maps showing the location of the main offences and threats identified, as well as information on their severity and extent, and on the actions taken to combat them, and reiterates its request to the State Party to take urgent measures to restore habitats degraded by illegal gold mining;
  5. Notes with satisfaction the progressive improvement of the ecological monitoring system and also requests the State Party to provide precise data on the state of conservation and the population trends of all the species characteristic of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), notably the elephant and the lycaon, in critical situation within the property;
  6. Reiterates its deep concern at the persistence of threats endangering the population of 15 threatened chimpanzees present in the impact zone of the Petowal Mining Company and urges the State Party to continue the annual ecological monitoring of this population and the implementation of actions to mitigate the impact of the main threats to the conservation of the species;
  7. Welcomes the controls carried out in relation to mining pollution and the installation of water and soil testing equipment at the property, but reiterates its utmost concern over high concentrations of ammonium, manganese and sulphate in the groundwater, and iron and heavy metals in the surface waters of the Gambia River, and further requests that water analyses be continued, that additional microbiological analyses be carried out, and that urgent measures be taken to identify the cause of this pollution and to control it permanently;
  8. Notes with satisfaction the identification and planning of the fight against the invasive species Mimosa pigra in three ponds of the property, but further requests the State Party to provide additional information on the other invasive species throughout the property and to develop an associated control strategy;
  9. Takes note of the protection and restoration measures planned at the time of the closure of the Mansadala quarry but reiterates once again its request to the State Party to immediately close this quarry given its negative impact on the OUV of the property;
  10. Noting that the financing for the Sambangalou dam has now been secured and that construction work is already underway, reiterates its concern about the potential impacts of the dam on the OUV of the property, notably on the hydrological regime of the Gambia River, downstream of the dam and on the distribution of large and medium-sized mammalian fauna, as indicated by the preliminary analysis of the complementary studies carried out on the environment and biodiversity of the Niokolo-Koba National Park and requests the State Party to provide, on the one hand, the Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP) from which the complementary studies were derived, and on the other, the report of the working group responsible for producing the synthesis of the various studies on the analysis of potential impacts and the proposal of selected compensation measures retained for examination by IUCN, to ensure that a full assessment of the potential impacts on OUV has been carried out in accordance with World Heritage impact assessments guidelines and best practices, and that the proposed mitigation measures, including any adjustments to project implementation, will effectively reduce these unavoidable residual impacts;
  11. Also expresses its concern about the numerous major potential impacts highlighted by the ESIA of the Barrick Gold mining project on the OUV of the property and its peripheral zone, and takes note that the State Party has not provided an environmental approval for its launch;
  12. Requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, to assess the state of conservation of the property, including with regard to the above issues, the implementation of the updated corrective measures and recommendations of the 2015 Reactive Monitoring mission, and the progress made in achieving the indicators of the DSOCR;
  13. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session;
  14. Decides to retain Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2023
Senegal
Date of Inscription: 1981
Category: Natural
Criteria: (x)
Danger List (dates): 2007-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top