jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Henderson Island (2005)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1990-1990)
Total Amount Ap proved: 8,000USD

1990   Contribution to the University of Oxford's expedition to involve ...   8,000  USD
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Absence of a Management Plan

Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

The State Party provided on 16 July 2004 an updated Management Plan (2004 – 2009), which IUCN reviewed.  The plan aims to ensure that the conservation and management of the property is undertaken in a sensitive and appropriate manner.   It highlights the key issues affecting the property both now and in the future, and outlines how these should be addressed.

The plan sets guidelines to ensure that human activities do not adversely impact the conservation of the island’s indigenous biota and natural environment.   It further identifies six principal management objectives:  protection of the geology, ecology and biota; ensure that the stocks of the timber species are adequate in meeting the needs of the Pitcairners on a sustainable basis; minimize interference with natural processes and the destruction or degradation of natural and archaeological features through human actions; ensure the island’s archaeological features remain available for visitors and scientific study; ensure tourist visits to the island cause no long term damage to the island and are beneficial to the Pitcairn Islanders and to promote an awareness through education and research.

The objectives as reported do not affect any current use of Henderson Island by Pitcairn Islanders.   The plan intends that well managed access to the island continues to be allowed for Pitcairners and responsible tourism.  The plan comprehensively deals with the description and resource inventory, management policies and guidelines.  The authorities have prepared a comprehensive Management Plan which provides a sound basis for the future management of the World Heritage property, and serve as the foundation for a more effective and cohesive approach through involving and respecting the individual roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders.

Conclusion
Decision
  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

29COM7B.26
Link to the decision

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,

2. Recalling its Decision 27 COM 7B.22 adopted at its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003),

3. Commends the State Party of the United Kingdom for its continued commitment to address the conservation concerns of the property and for providing an updated management plan for the property;

4. Requests that the State Party continue to keep the World Heritage Centre and IUCN informed on the progress made in the implementation of the plan; and

5. Further requests the State Party to provide a detailed report on the state of conservation of the property by 1 February 2007, for examination by the Committee at its 31st session (2007).

Draft Decision: 29 COM 7B.26

The World Heritage Committee,

1.              Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,

2.              Recalling its Decision 27 COM 7B.22adopted at its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003),

3.              Commends the State Party for its continued commitment to address the conservation concerns of the property and for providing an updated Management Plan for the property;

4.              Requests that the State Party continue to keep the World Heritage Centre and IUCN informed on the progress made in the implementation of the plan; and

5.              Further requests the State Party to provide a detailed report on the state of conservation of the property by 1 February 2007, for examination by the Committee at its 31st session in 2007.

Henderson Island
State Party:
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Date of Inscription: 1988
Nomination records (Year): 1987
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(x)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2012
2010
2008
2007
2005
2004
Threats*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.