Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

32
Reports
14
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Human resourcesclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Human resources
Other Threats: h) Educational reform not implemented
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Threats*: Human resources
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Human resources
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Human resources
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Human resources
Other Threats: a) Urban decay of the Historic Centreb) Water and environmental pollutionc) Lack of monitoring systems
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Human resources
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Human resources
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Human resources
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Human resources
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Human resources
Other Threats: Lack of infrastructure and services for small producers and potential tourism initiatives hinder sustainable economic development and are underlying causes for poverty, leading to over-exploitation of natural resources
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Human resources
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top