Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

22
Reports
22
Properties concerned
21
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 1991close
Date end:1991close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park nepal Nepal 1991 Water (extraction) , No
dinosaur provincial parkDinosaur Provincial Park canada Canada 1991 Management systems/ management plan, Oil and gas, No
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 1991
Other Threats: Training course on wetland management
 No
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park montenegro Montenegro 1991 Localised utilities, Surface water pollution, No
garajonay national parkGarajonay National Park spain Spain 1991 Ground transport infrastructure, No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1991 Civil unrest, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1991 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, No
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park argentina Argentina 1991 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, No
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1991 Ground transport infrastructure, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1991 Civil unrest, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1991 Financial resources, Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, No
olympic national parkOlympic National Park united states of america United States of America 1991 Pollution of marine waters, No
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park croatia Croatia 1991 Illegal activities, War, No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 1991 Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1991 Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Management systems/ management plan, No
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1991 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Opening of a route to drive cattle
 No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 1991 Civil unrest, No
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 1991 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Surface water pollution, Water (extraction) , Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 1991 Management systems/ management plan, Oil and gas, No
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland australia Australia 1991 Financial resources, Management systems/ management plan, Water infrastructure, No
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park canada Canada 1991 Forestry /wood production, Localised utilities, Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top