Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya

Nomination 1056rev (inscribed)
2002 Nomination file 1056rev (6 MB)
Advisory Bodies Evaluations
2002 Advisory Body Evaluation (ICOMOS)
Maps
2002 Mahabodhi Temple Guide Map
Decisions
2014 38COM 7B.12 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India) (C 1056rev)
2013 37COM 8E - Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value
2012 36COM 7B.61 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India) (C1056 rev)
2010 34COM 7B.70 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India) (C1056 rev)
2007 31COM 7B.82 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodhgaya (India)
2006 30COM 7B.64 - State of Conservation (Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya)
2005 29COM 7B.52 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodhgaya (India)
2004 28COM 15B.57 -
2003 27COM 7B.46 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India)
2002 Report of the 26th Session of the Committee
2002 26COM 23.15 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India)
2002 26COM 23.16 - Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India)
Mission reports
2011 Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring Mission to the Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (India), 21-27 February 2011
Periodic Reporting
2012 Periodic Reporting Cycle 2, Section II
State of Conservation Reports by States Parties
2014 Summary of the State of conservation report by the State Party / Résumé du Rapport de l'Etat partie sur l'état de conservation
State of conservation reports
2014 State of conservation reports
2012 State of conservation reports
2010 State of conservation reports
2007 State of conservation reports
2006 State of conservation reports
2005 State of conservation reports
2004 State of conservation reports
2003 State of conservation reports
Disclaimer

The Nomination files produced by the States Parties are published by the World Heritage Centre at its website and/or in working documents in order to ensure transparency, access to information and to facilitate the preparations of comparative analysis by other nominating States Parties.

The sole responsibility for the content of each Nomination file lies with the State Party concerned. The publication of the Nomination file does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the World Heritage Committee or of the Secretariat of UNESCO concerning the history or legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its boundaries.

top