State of Conservation
50
Reports
50
Properties concerned
31
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
1994close
Date end:1994close
| States Parties: |
 Benin
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
| Threats*: | Storms |
| Other Threats: | Dilapidated state of conservation |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Norway
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Risk of uncontrolled property development |
| States Parties: |
 Brazil
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
| Threats*: | Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Fire |
| States Parties: |
 Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
| Threats*: | Air pollution Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure Housing Localised utilities Major linear utilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Temperature Water (rain/water table) |
| Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
| States Parties: |
 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Interpretative and visitation facilities Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 United States of America
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
| Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 China
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| States Parties: |
 Mali
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.4,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
| Threats*: | Desertification Financial resources Legal framework Water (rain/water table) Wind |
| Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Poland
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
| Threats*: | Relative humidity Water (rain/water table) |
| Other Threats: | Gradual degradation |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Türkiye
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Flooding Ground transport infrastructure Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan Water (rain/water table) |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Benin Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Croatia Egypt France Germany Greece Guatemala Italy Jordan Mali Malta Mexico Mozambique Nepal Norway Oman Peru Poland Russian Federation Spain Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Viet NamThreats
Management systems/ management plan 21 Legal framework 10 Ground transport infrastructure 7 Water (rain/water table) 7 Management activities 7 Housing 6 Human resources 5 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 4 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure 4 Air pollution 4 Relative humidity 4 Erosion and siltation/ deposition 4 Financial resources 4 Interpretative and visitation facilities 3 Land conversion 3 Wind 3 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 3 Storms 3 Commercial development 2 Air transport infrastructure 2 Solid waste 2 Temperature 2 Deliberate destruction of heritage 2 Illegal activities 2 Governance 2 Localised utilities 1 Major linear utilities 1 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 1 Quarrying 1 Micro-organisms 1 Pests 1 Radiation/light 1 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community 1 Terrorism 1 War 1 Desertification 1 Flooding 1 Invasive/alien terrestrial species 1
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
