State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Niger |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Decline in wildlife populations |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Zambia Zimbabwe |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Unsustainable resource use practices |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.