State of Conservation
67
Reports
53
Properties concerned
36
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:1992close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
Threats*: | War |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 1982 |
Document Source: | CLT-82/CONF.014/3,CLT-82/CONF.014/6 |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Legal framework Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Loss of historical authenticity |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Increasing number of dilapidated buildings |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Increasing number of dilapidated buildings |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
Threats*: | Flooding |
Other Threats: | Poor maintenance |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.003/12 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1989 |
Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.004/12 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/12 |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Other Threats: | Structural issues, cracks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Storms |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1988 |
Document Source: | SC-88/CONF.001/13 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Other Threats: | Partial collapse of some platforms |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/2,CC-90/CONF.004/3 Add. |
Threats*: | Desertification Financial resources Legal framework Water (rain/water table) Wind |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1989 |
Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.004/12 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Housing Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties
Algeria Benin Brazil Bulgaria Canada China Croatia Ecuador Egypt France Germany Greece Haiti Holy See Hungary Italy Lebanon Libya Mali Malta Montenegro Morocco Nepal Oman Pakistan Poland Portugal Russian Federation Senegal Serbia Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America YemenThreats
Housing 16 Management systems/ management plan 16 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 11 Water (rain/water table) 10 Earthquake 9 Relative humidity 8 Management activities 7 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure 5 Avalanche/ landslide 5 Flooding 4 Storms 4 Erosion and siltation/ deposition 4 Legal framework 4 Micro-organisms 3 Financial resources 3 Human resources 3 Ground transport infrastructure 2 Air pollution 2 Solid waste 2 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 2 Temperature 2 Wind 2 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community 2 War 2 Commercial development 1 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 1 Water infrastructure 1 Mining 1 Radiation/light 1 Ritual / spiritual / religious and associative uses 1 Deliberate destruction of heritage 1 Desertification 1 Governance 1
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.