State of Conservation
20
Reports
7
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2001close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman |
2000 | Legal framework, | No |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman |
1999 | Legal framework, | No |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman |
1998 | Legal framework, | No |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman |
1997 | Legal framework, | No |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman |
1996 | Legal framework, | No |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman |
1995 | Legal framework, | No |
danube deltaDanube Delta | romania |
1993 | Legal framework, | No |
danube deltaDanube Delta | romania |
1992 | Legal framework, | No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador |
1997 | Legal framework, | No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador |
1996 | Legal framework, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru |
2001 | Legal framework, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru |
2000 | Legal framework, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru |
1987 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Fires |
No |
k’gari (fraser island)K’gari (Fraser Island) | australia |
2001 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Risk to humans posed by the dingo population |
No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation |
2001 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation |
2000 | Legal framework, | No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation |
1998 | Legal framework, | No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation |
1997 | Legal framework, | No |
škocjan cavesŠkocjan Caves | slovenia |
1996 | Legal framework, | No |
škocjan cavesŠkocjan Caves | slovenia |
1995 | Legal framework, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.