Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

18
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Industrial areasclose
Everglades National Park (2003)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2000)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1999)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1998)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1997)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1996)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1995)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1994)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1993)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Industrial areas
Everglades National Park (1992)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Industrial areas
Everglades National Park (1989)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Industrial areas
Fort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore (2003)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
Jesuit Missions of La Santísima Trinidad de Paraná and Jesús de Tavarangue (2003)
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) (2003)
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Industrial areas
Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) (1999)
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Industrial areas
Other Threats: Aggressive natural environment
Mammoth Cave National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Industrial areas
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Pakistan Paraguay United States of America
Threats
Industrial areas 18

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top