State of Conservation
58
Reports
18
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date end:1999close
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production Ground water pollution |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1984 |
Document Source: | SC/84/CONF.004/7,SC/84/CONF.004/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1983 |
Document Source: | SC/83/CONF.009/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Storms |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Storms |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Management activities Society's valuing of heritage Volcanic eruption |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Management activities Society's valuing of heritage Volcanic eruption |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species Management activities |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Other Threats: | No specific threat identified |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Problems with landowners resident in the site and aboriginal concerns |
States Parties
Albania Australia China Greece Guatemala Mali New Zealand North Macedonia Peru Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of TanzaniaThreats
Management systems/ management plan 31 Ground transport infrastructure 11 Forestry /wood production 9 Mining 6 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 5 Water infrastructure 4 Fire (widlfires) 4 Financial resources 4 Management activities 3 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 2 Crop production 2 Oil and gas 2 Society's valuing of heritage 2 Storms 2 Volcanic eruption 2 Housing 1 Interpretative and visitation facilities 1 Major linear utilities 1 Ground water pollution 1 Input of excess energy 1 Solid waste 1 Land conversion 1 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 1 Invasive/alien terrestrial species 1 Legal framework 1
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.