State of Conservation
19
Reports
19
Properties concerned
17
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
Threats* : Aquacultureclose
Commercial huntingclose
Subsistence huntingclose
Commercial wild plant collectionclose
Subsistence wild plant collectionclose
Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animalsclose
Forestry /wood productionclose
Fishing/collecting aquatic resourcesclose
Crop productionclose
| States Parties: |
 Oman
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals |
| States Parties: |
 Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
| States Parties: |
 Cameroon
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Commercial hunting Forestry /wood production |
| States Parties: |
 United States of America
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Crop production |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Ecuador
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources |
| States Parties: |
 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources |
| States Parties: |
 Canada
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
| States Parties: |
 Australia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources |
| States Parties: |
 Tunisia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.11 |
| Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Subsistence hunting |
| Other Threats: | Excessive salinity of the water |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Indonesia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
| States Parties: |
 Central African Republic
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Kenya
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals |
| States Parties: |
Ecuador
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Sri Lanka
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Crop production |
| States Parties: |
 Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Australia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
| Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
| States Parties: |
 Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
United States of America
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
| Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
| Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
