State of Conservation
409
Reports
114
Properties concerned
65
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2015close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risk of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled vendors around the property |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of conservation of residential housing in the area inscribed as World Heritage |
States Parties
Afghanistan Algeria Austria Bahrain Belgium Brazil Canada Chile China Colombia Cyprus Czechia Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Holy See Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lithuania Malaysia Malta Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Nigeria Pakistan Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Russian Federation Slovakia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.