State of Conservation
306
Reports
67
Properties concerned
47
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2005close
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | degradation of traditional houses |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | degradation of traditional houses |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | degradation of traditional houses |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Czechia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need to initiate a process for the recovery of the urban and social fabric of the property |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Austria Bahrain Belgium Chile China Colombia Czechia Egypt France Germany Ghana Haiti Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Mauritius Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Nigeria Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Russian Federation Spain Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.