State of Conservation
106
Reports
40
Properties concerned
35
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2008close
Date end:2019close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Poor state of conservation of the monastic irrigation system |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Poor state of conservation of the monastic irrigation system |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of monitoring; Poor state of conservation of the monastic irrigation system |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural degradation of its components of the property |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Slopes of the archaeological mound non stabilized |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Slopes of the archaeological mound non stabilized |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration |
States Parties
Argentina Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Georgia Indonesia Iraq Ireland Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lesotho Libya Malta Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Peru Russian Federation Saudi Arabia South Africa Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.