State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 1990 |
| Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/4 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
Spain
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Decline in the population of Siberian cranes |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 1990 |
| Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/13 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Decline in the population of Siberian cranes |
| States Parties: |
 Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | a) Decline in animals population; b) Reduction of control fires |
| States Parties: |
 Slovenia
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| States Parties: |
 Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-01/CONF.208/INF.5,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/13 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Water (extraction) |
| Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
| Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Australia Bulgaria India Nepal New Zealand Slovenia Spain United Republic of Tanzania Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Water (extraction) 29
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
