State of Conservation
14
Reports
14
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2006close
Date end:2006close
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Transhumance |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Degradation of buffer zone |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.