State of Conservation
16
Reports
13
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:1992close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
amphitheatre of el jemAmphitheatre of El Jem | tunisia |
1992 | Housing, | No |
budapest, including the banks of the danube, the buda castle quarter and andrássy avenueBudapest, including the Banks of the Danube, the Buda Castle Quarter and Andrássy Avenue | hungary |
1992 | Housing, | No |
historic district of old quebecHistoric District of Old Québec | canada |
1992 | Housing, | No |
historic district of old quebecHistoric District of Old Québec | canada |
1988 | Housing, | No |
historic district of old quebecHistoric District of Old Québec | canada |
1987 | Housing, | No |
historic town of ouro pretoHistoric Town of Ouro Preto | brazil |
1990 | Housing, | No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal |
1992 | Housing,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt |
1990 | Housing,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 1982 | Housing,
Other Threats: Loss of historical authenticity |
No |
old city of sana'aOld City of Sana'a | yemen |
1991 | Housing,
Other Threats: Increasing number of dilapidated buildings |
No |
old city of sana'aOld City of Sana'a | yemen |
1990 | Housing,
Other Threats: Increasing number of dilapidated buildings |
No |
paris, banks of the seineParis, Banks of the Seine | france |
1992 | Housing, | No |
speyer cathedralSpeyer Cathedral | germany |
1987 | Housing, | No |
tipasaTipasa | algeria |
1990 | Housing, | No |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
1992 | Housing, | No |
vatican cityVatican City | holy see |
1992 | Housing, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.