State of Conservation
14
Reports
10
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2016close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.207/2,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.207/2,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
Other Threats: | Many buildings in a bad state of conservation |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
Other Threats: | Many buildings in a bad state of conservation |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.207/2,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Air pollution |
Threats
Air pollution 14
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.