Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

129
Reports
32
Properties concerned
15
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2002close
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: Canada United States of America
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources Forestry /wood production Housing Illegal activities Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Legal framework Major linear utilities Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Financial resources Forestry /wood production Housing Illegal activities Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Legal framework Major linear utilities Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Financial resources Forestry /wood production Housing Illegal activities Legal framework Surface water pollution
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources Forestry /wood production Surface water pollution
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Financial resources Forestry /wood production Legal framework Surface water pollution
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Legal framework Surface water pollution
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure Industrial areas
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan Mining
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2001
Document Source: ,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Mining
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Pollution of marine waters
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/15
Threats*: Pollution of marine waters
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Pollution of marine waters
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/INF.9
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Croatia
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top